Review documented property coverage
Loading dated local Google feature catalogue…
Ready. Nothing has been uploaded.
Output
Four property coverage examples
- Product with name only: Paste a Product containing
@typeandname. The scorecard identifies which properties are present and which documented fields may be absent for the selected Google feature. - Product with Offer: Add a truthful Offer containing
priceandpriceCurrency. Compare the score with the previous version, but remember that field presence alone cannot establish eligibility. - Article with author and dates: Inspect an Article containing a headline, author, and actual publication date. Check whether nested properties are recognized for the selected feature and whether the page displays matching information.
- Multiple @graph entities: Paste an
@graphwith Organization, WebSite and Product nodes. Use the entity selector to inspect the intended entity rather than assuming every graph node has the same requirements.
Common mistakes and fixes
A high percentage does not mean Google will show a rich result. This tool compares against a dated, curated local catalogue, not the complete or live Google policy system. Do not add invented reviews, prices, availability or author identities just to improve a score. Do not treat recommended fields as universally required; rules vary by feature and can change. If the wrong entity is selected, switch the entity selector before drawing conclusions.
Review workflow: Confirm the feature, check the dated catalogue source and required/recommended field labels, inspect real on-page facts, and then test the published page with the Google Rich Results Test. A scorecard is a planning aid, not a certificate.
Step-by-step tutorial: Read the Property Coverage Scorecard guide and FAQs →



